<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Recap of Hacks/Hackers goes to Google: Wave and journalism</title> <atom:link href="http://hackshackers.com/blog/2010/03/19/recap-of-hackshackers-goes-to-google-wave-and-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://hackshackers.com/blog/2010/03/19/recap-of-hackshackers-goes-to-google-wave-and-journalism/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=recap-of-hackshackers-goes-to-google-wave-and-journalism</link> <description>Journalism x Technology</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:01:27 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-beta2-20538</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: mattymatt</title><link>http://hackshackers.com/blog/2010/03/19/recap-of-hackshackers-goes-to-google-wave-and-journalism/#comment-17</link> <dc:creator>mattymatt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:42:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hackshackers.com/?p=277#comment-17</guid> <description>It was interesting to really go under the hood and see all the little dials and gizmos and things. I wonder, though, if that might be a turnoff for reporters, who work fast and need things to be as simple as possible? &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For example, at the press conference that I went to yesterday with the mayor, most of the print reporters had a simple voice recorder, or a pad of paper and pen. But the reporters from TV stations needed a dedicated videographer with them to work the camera. It seems like reporters expect to have a trained technician for anything more complicated than a voice recorder.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mocked up a few ways that Wave could be made a little more neophyte-friendly here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.writersgettingpaid.mattbaume.com/changes-to-google-wave/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.writersgettingpaid.mattbaume.com/cha...&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was interesting to really go under the hood and see all the little dials and gizmos and things. I wonder, though, if that might be a turnoff for reporters, who work fast and need things to be as simple as possible?</p><p>For example, at the press conference that I went to yesterday with the mayor, most of the print reporters had a simple voice recorder, or a pad of paper and pen. But the reporters from TV stations needed a dedicated videographer with them to work the camera. It seems like reporters expect to have a trained technician for anything more complicated than a voice recorder.</p><p>I mocked up a few ways that Wave could be made a little more neophyte-friendly here: <a href="http://www.writersgettingpaid.mattbaume.com/changes-to-google-wave/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.writersgettingpaid.mattbaume.com/cha" rel="nofollow">http://www.writersgettingpaid.mattbaume.com/cha</a>&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: hackshackers.com @ 2012-05-04 18:00:41 -->
